The Seedlings To Stars 2012 Top 100 Prospects, #64: Eric Surkamp

by Lists/Rankings

Name: Eric Surkamp
DOB: 7/16/87
Organization: Giants
Position: Pitcher
Notable 2011 Stats: 2.02 ERA, 2.37 FIP, 5 HRA, 44 BB, 165 K, and 44% GB% in 142 1/3 IP with Richmond (AA);
5.74 ERA, 4.68 FIP, 1 HRA, 17 BB, 13 K, and 35.2% GB% in 26 2/3 IP with San Francisco

Why He’s This High: Surkamp entered 2011 as a question mark, as it was unclear whether his finesse repertoire would continue to play at the upper levels. He erased those doubts by actually improving his strikeout rate from his 2010 High-A season, and he continued to throw strikes and prevent homers.

Surkamp has two plus pitches: a big mid-70′s curveball and a fading 78-82 mph changeup. He utilizes a deceptive motion with a three-quarters release point, and he uses the same arm slot to throw all of his pitches. While he does create deception with his delivery, it’s also quite clean, and the big lefthander should be a durable innings-eater.

His track record obviously speaks for itself, as he hasn’t posted a FIP above 2.54 in full-season ball save for his major league time.

Why He’s This Low: At age 24, Surkamp basically is what he is–as a pitcher who’s already pitched in the majors, he has a high floor, but his upside likely isn’t all that high.

Surkamp averaged 87.9 mph with his fastball in the majors, usually pitching at 86-90 mph. His fastball does have good movement, but he leaves it up in the zone too often, as evidenced by his high flyball rate in the majors.

Surkamp obviously struggled in his initial MLB exposure, walking more batters than he struck out. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that he only faced eight lefthanded batters against 118 righthanders, but still, he has to do a much better job of spotting his fastball to MLB hitters to set up his offspeed offerings. He could probably benefit from some time in Triple-A to better bridge that gap. That, of course, means he likely won’t be ready to be an MLB asset until he turns 25.

Conclusions: Surkamp upgraded his status by proving his stuff plays in the upper minors, but then his MLB struggles cast a shadow on his ability to do what really matters–retiring MLB hitters with consistency.

We shouldn’t just write Surkamp off due to six tough starts following his skipping a level, but at the same time, many have predicted that he’d ultimately fail to make a big league impact due to his iffy velocity. I think he’s got enough stuff to be a #3 or even a #2 starter, but he has to get much better with his locations than he showed in his first MLB exposure. In particular, he’ll have to drive his fastball lower in the zone to set up his offspeed offerings and avoid walks and meatballs. He’s almost certainly better than he showed in his MLB stint, but he’s got a lot of refinements to make if he’s going to be the rare “soft-tosser” to be a difference-making MLB starter.

Check out all of the Seedlings To Stars 2012 Top 100 Prospects here!

For more on the Giants, check out Frisco Fastball!

Follow us on Twitter: Nathaniel (@stoltz_baseball), Wally (@thebaseballfish), James (@JAYRC_MCB) and Joe (@ReleasePoints). You can also keep up to date with all things S2S by following the site on Twitter (@Seedlings2Stars) or liking our Facebook page.

 

Topics: Eric Surkamp, San Francisco Giants

Comments
  • oldbarn98

    Putting Surkamp at #64 takes a lot of courage. Candidly I don’t see it. He does have great command of his pitches but the stuff is not there. It’s very hard to pitch in the majors throwing 88 MPH unless your location is nearly perfect and you have plus secondary pitches. Surkamp’s secondary pitches generally grade out at above average.

    He’s primarily gotten by with deception in the minors. If you’ve seen him throw, he hides the ball very well and comes at the hitters in a funky 3/4 arm slot but holds the ball in such a way that it jumps out. This will work for a while in High-A and AA and maybe even for a while in the majors, but in my opinion, major league batters will figure it out, even in the hitter challenged NL West. In fact, the start to his major league career was not good. I know you say to be careful with the small sample but it is a big red flag and given his lack of true stuff, he profiles as a back-end of the rotation guy.

    • NathanielStoltz

      @oldbarn98 Honestly, looking back on my list, this is one of the ones I’m least happy about. Obviously, I made the list now well over a month ago, and stuff changes. As time goes by, I do worry more and more about the things you cite.

      As I said, I think he may have it in him to adjust…but yeah, it certainly takes courage to believe it. Depending on how I approach looking at him any given day, that courage changes.

      Now, the OTHER finesse lefty I’m going to be talking about this week, I’m much more confident in. Mainly because he’s proven himself in Triple-A and had none of Surkamp’s adjustment issues in the majors.